pdfToMarkdown vs Mathpix: Which PDF API Should You Use?
If you’re a developer trying to extract text from PDFs, you’ve probably run into Mathpix. It’s one of the most well-known tools in the space, with excellent support for mathematical notation. But is it the right choice for your use case?
This post breaks down the key differences between Mathpix and pdfToMarkdown, so you can choose the right tool without wasting time on free trial experiments.
What Mathpix does well
Mathpix built its reputation on one thing: converting handwritten or typeset math to LaTeX. If you’re processing scientific papers, textbooks, or engineering documents full of equations, Mathpix is genuinely excellent. It handles complex notation — integrals, matrices, chemical formulas — better than any general-purpose OCR tool.
The Snip API and the full PDF processing pipeline both produce LaTeX-rendered markdown with proper $$...$$ blocks for equations. If you’re building a tool for academics, students, or scientific publishers, that output matters.
Where Mathpix falls short for most developers
The problem is that most developers don’t need LaTeX. They need:
- Clean markdown from invoices, contracts, reports, and documentation
- A simple HTTP API they can call in two lines
- Pricing that won’t hurt on a side project
On all three counts, Mathpix is a poor fit.
Pricing
Mathpix pricing is complex and expensive for general use:
| Usage | Mathpix | pdfToMarkdown |
|---|---|---|
| First test | Free trial (limited) | Free, no signup |
| Light use | $0.004–$0.006 per page | Free (100 pages/month) |
| API access | Requires account + card | GitHub login, no card |
| Developer preview | N/A | 100 pages/month free |
Mathpix charges per page and the free tier is heavily limited. For prototyping or side projects, the friction of entering a credit card before you’ve validated anything is a real obstacle.
API complexity
The Mathpix API is functional but more complex than it needs to be for common use cases. You need to deal with:
- Multiple endpoints for different document types
- Base64-encoded image uploads
- Async job polling for long documents
- Their own response schema with nested blocks
With pdfToMarkdown, it’s a single POST:
# No signup required — use the public demo key
curl -X POST https://pdftomarkdown.dev/v1/convert \
-H "Authorization: Bearer demo_public_key" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"input":{"pdf_url":"https://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/tests/xhtml/testfiles/resources/pdf/dummy.pdf"}}'
You get back JSON with a markdown field. That’s it.
Output format
Mathpix produces its own MMD (Mathpix Markdown) format as the intermediate representation, which is then converted to markdown. For non-scientific documents, the output often contains unnecessary LaTeX fragments and formatting artifacts.
For typical business documents — PDFs with tables, headers, bullet lists — pdfToMarkdown’s output is cleaner because it’s optimized for document structure, not equation rendering.
When Mathpix wins
Be honest: if your primary use case involves:
- Scientific papers with dense mathematical notation
- Engineering documents with formulas
- Converting handwritten math to LaTeX
- Academic publishing workflows
Then Mathpix is the better tool. It’s specialized for exactly that, and the quality shows.
When pdfToMarkdown wins
For the majority of developer use cases, pdfToMarkdown is the better choice:
- General documents: invoices, contracts, reports, user manuals
- Developer-first pricing: free to start, no credit card, no sales calls
- Simple API: one endpoint, one response field, no custom formats
- LLM pipelines: clean markdown that feeds directly into context windows
- Side projects and prototypes: validate before you pay
Practical comparison: processing an invoice
Here’s what a typical workflow looks like:
Mathpix approach:
import mathpix
import base64
# Read and encode the file
with open("invoice.pdf", "rb") as f:
pdf_b64 = base64.b64encode(f.read()).decode()
client = mathpix.MathpixClient(app_id="...", app_key="...")
result = client.pdf_to_mmd(pdf_b64)
# result is in MMD format, not standard markdown
markdown = result.mmd
pdfToMarkdown approach:
from pdftomarkdown import convert
result = convert("invoice.pdf")
print(result.markdown) # clean markdown, ready to use
The difference in friction compounds over time — especially when onboarding new team members or debugging a pipeline at 2am.
Bottom line
| Mathpix | pdfToMarkdown | |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | Scientific/math documents | General business documents |
| Pricing | Credits, expensive for scale | Free to 100 pages/month |
| API simplicity | Moderate | Very simple |
| Output | MMD / LaTeX-aware markdown | Clean standard markdown |
| Free tier | Limited trial | 100 pages/month, no card |
| Math equations | Excellent | Basic |
If your documents have LaTeX equations, use Mathpix. For everything else, try pdfToMarkdown for free — no credit card, no signup, just a curl command.